quick

Compress small code fixes into a phased workflow with verification and HTML report output.

3|Updated May 11, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/nadyshalaby/hackify --skill quick-nadyshalaby
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: quick
Source: https://github.com/nadyshalaby/hackify/tree/main/skills/quick
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/nadyshalaby/hackify --skill quick-nadyshalaby

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill streamlines genuinely small, low-risk edits so they can be completed faster without the overhead of the full hackify workflow.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Compressed workflow: Handles quick fixes, tiny edits, typo corrections, and minor tweaks with a reduced phase set.
  • Mandatory verification: Still requires a fresh test, lint, and typecheck triad plus a lightweight review before finishing.
  • Clear escalation path: Stays in quick mode for the task, but can be explicitly promoted to full hackify for larger or riskier changes.
  • Use case: A developer asks to correct a spelling mistake in a README or make a one-line wording change in a single file.

Quick Start

Use the quick skill to fix a small typo in README.md and return the updated file with verification results.

Frequently Asked Questions about quick

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I ship small code fixes without triggering a full code review workflow?

Small code fixes can be shipped quickly using a compressed workflow that skips full multi-reviewer ceremony but still enforces mandatory test, lint, and typecheck verification before applying minor tweaks.

What's the best way to handle typo corrections and one-line documentation edits safely?

Typo corrections and one-line documentation edits are handled safely by a disciplined workflow that compresses phases, runs fresh verification checks, performs a single-lens review, and outputs an HTML report with an Area/Change summary.

Does fixing a single line of code require a full multi-reviewer process?

A single line of code fix does not require a full multi-reviewer process if it uses a quick workflow mode, which applies a reduced phase set while maintaining mandatory test, lint, and typecheck verification.

When should I escalate a quick fix to a full development workflow?

A quick fix should be explicitly promoted to a full workflow when the change scope expands beyond small edits or the risk level rises, ensuring larger modifications receive appropriate multi-reviewer ceremony.

What verification checks are mandatory for minor code tweaks before shipping?

Mandatory verification checks for minor code tweaks include a fresh test, lint, and typecheck triad, followed by a lightweight single-lens review and cleanup of the touched scope before generating a final summary.