skills.rest
diana-uk
diana-ukCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

r

Identify actionable code review feedback using a six-dimension rubric.

Updated Feb 9, 2026
Search Tags:#automation#feedback#rubric#software-quality#code-review#senior-engineer
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/diana-uk/senior-interview-mentor --skill r
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: r
Source: https://github.com/diana-uk/senior-interview-mentor/tree/main/.claude/skills/r
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/diana-uk/senior-interview-mentor --skill r

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill standardizes and accelerates technical code reviews by applying a consistent six-dimension rubric to provide honest, actionable feedback.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Six-dimension rubric covering correctness, readability, design, performance, test coverage, and maintainability.
  • Structured feedback with concrete, actionable recommendations and examples.
  • Mentorship and onboarding support for Junior to Senior engineers during review sessions.

Quick Start

Paste your code or share a file path, and I will perform a senior-engineer style 6-dimension code review.

Frequently Asked Questions about r

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I standardize code reviews using a rubric across different programming languages?▼

Standardize code reviews by applying a six-dimension rubric covering correctness, readability, design, performance, test coverage, and maintainability. This approach works across languages and codebases to deliver consistent, actionable feedback during pull requests and mentorship sessions.

Can I use a code review rubric for onboarding junior engineers?▼

Yes, a structured code review rubric supports onboarding and mentorship by providing concrete, actionable recommendations and examples. It helps junior engineers understand senior-level expectations across correctness, readability, design, performance, test coverage, and maintainability.

What is the best way to automate actionable feedback for pull requests?▼

Automate actionable feedback by implementing a formal code review rubric that evaluates correctness, readability, design, performance, test coverage, and maintainability. This standardizes the review process and accelerates delivery of honest, senior-engineer style recommendations.

Does this structured code review approach work with any codebase?▼

Yes, the six-dimension code review rubric is applicable across languages and codebases. You can paste code or share a file path to receive structured feedback regardless of the specific technology stack or project size.

What dimensions should a senior engineer evaluate during a code review?▼

A senior engineer should evaluate six dimensions during code reviews: correctness, readability, design, performance, test coverage, and maintainability. This structured rubric ensures comprehensive assessment and delivers actionable feedback with scoring guidance.

When should I not use a structured rubric for code reviews?▼

A structured rubric may add unnecessary overhead for trivial changes or quick fixes where a full six-dimension assessment of correctness, readability, design, performance, test coverage, and maintainability is not required for effective code review.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
msd-dev-labmsd-dev-lab

codex-review-requirements

Review requirements.md for completeness, feasibility, ambiguity, and EARS compliance.

Official
Advanced
lossyroblossyrob
39

paw-impl-review

Analyze implementation changes and return a pass/fail verdict with issues.

Community
Advanced
OneWave-AIOneWave-AI
245

code-review-pro

Review code for security vulnerabilities, performance bottlenecks, and maintainability issues.

Official
Basic
jimCresswelljimCresswell

jc-gates

Run automated quality gates and security scans on code repositories.

Community
Intermediate