raisonnement-juridique

Analyze civil litigation to produce structured legal reasoning with syllogisms.

9|3|Updated Dec 6, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/mauryaland/mcp-magistrat-civil --skill raisonnement-juridique
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: raisonnement-juridique
Source: https://github.com/mauryaland/mcp-magistrat-civil/tree/main/skills/raisonnement-juridique
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/mauryaland/mcp-magistrat-civil --skill raisonnement-juridique

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill eliminates the complex, time-consuming manual process of French civil legal analysis. It automates the structured reasoning of a French civil judge, ensuring adherence to established legal methodologies and significantly reducing research and drafting effort.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured Legal Reasoning: Applies the rigorous judicial syllogism (majeure, mineure, conclusion) for precise legal analysis.
  • French Legal Database Access: Seamlessly integrates with Judilibre (French case law) and Légifrance (French statutes) for comprehensive and up-to-date legal research.
  • Judgment Drafting Assistance: Guides the formulation of civil judgment motivations, adhering to the methodological guidelines of the ENM/Cour de cassation.
  • Fact Qualification: Accurately qualifies facts and legal acts, distinguishing between claims, legal arguments, and factual arguments.
  • Use Case: A legal professional needs to analyze a complex civil dispute. This Skill can help identify key legal questions, find relevant case law and statutes, and draft a structured legal opinion or judgment motivation, saving hours of manual research and ensuring methodological rigor.

Quick Start

Utilise la compétence raisonnement-juridique pour traiter le sujet suivant : Le caractère utile des diligences interruptives de péremption au sens du code de procédure civile.

Frequently Asked Questions about raisonnement-juridique

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate structured legal analysis for French civil disputes?

Legal analysis for French civil disputes can be automated using judicial syllogism (majeure, mineure, conclusion) to identify legal questions, qualify facts, and construct reasoned judgments. This Skill applies that methodology to civil litigation, integrating Judilibre and Légifrance to retrieve relevant case law and statutes, then drafts complete judgment motivation texts in both machine and human-readable formats.

Can I use this for drafting civil judgment motivations according to French judicial standards?

Yes. This Skill guides formulation of civil judgment motivations following ENM and Cour de cassation methodological guidelines. It distinguishes claims, legal arguments, and factual arguments; applies hierarchy-aware decision weighting; and generates complete dispositive and motivation texts that meet established French judicial standards.

How does this Skill retrieve French legal sources during analysis?

The Skill seamlessly integrates with Judilibre (French case law database) and Légifrance (French statutes) to retrieve comprehensive, up-to-date legal sources. During analysis, it pulls relevant jurisprudence and legislative texts to support syllogistic reasoning and source-based justification in judgment drafting.

What's the difference between claims, legal arguments, and factual arguments in civil reasoning?

In civil legal reasoning, claims are what parties assert; legal arguments apply law to facts; factual arguments establish what happened. This Skill accurately qualifies each distinction during analysis, ensuring proper differentiation in the structured reasoning that supports judgment.

Do I need legal expertise to use structured civil legal reasoning?

The Skill automates the structured reasoning process itself—identifying legal questions, constructing syllogisms, and retrieving sources—but is designed for legal professionals who understand French civil procedure and substantive law. It reduces research and drafting effort for practitioners already working in this domain.

What limitations should I know about automated judgment reasoning?

Automated reasoning applies established methodologies rigorously but cannot replace judicial discretion or contextual judgment nuance. The Skill excels at structured analysis, source retrieval, and draft generation; however, final judgment decisions and fact-specific equitable considerations remain within the practitioner's purview.