Review product requirement documents for logical gaps and risks.
npx skills add https://github.com/pisithrps/yapzee --skill ralph-wiggum-pisithrps
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: ralph-wiggum Source: https://github.com/pisithrps/yapzee/tree/main/.claude/skills/ralph-wiggum Command: npx skills add https://github.com/pisithrps/yapzee --skill ralph-wiggum-pisithrps
This Skill provides a fast, devil's-advocate review of PRDs, strategy docs, decision memos, and other product artifacts to surface logical gaps, unsupported claims, missing metrics, and risky assumptions before stakeholder review.
Type /ralph-wiggum and paste your PRD or point to a file path for a quick skeptical review.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
A devil's-advocate PRD review identifies unsupported assumptions, missing data, and metric weaknesses by applying a skeptical critique to your product requirement documents. It delivers prioritized findings with severity ratings, suggested fixes, and targeted questions to surface logical gaps.
The best way to critique a product strategy document is to run a devil's-advocate review that flags cherry-picked quotes, weak user research, and contradictions. This approach provides a concise TL;DR and actionable fixes to identify risky claims before stakeholder review.
Yes, you can run a skeptical risk assessment on pasted content, decision memos, or files in outputs/prds. The review identifies logical leaps, verifies evidence, and cross-references relevant context files to deliver prioritized, actionable findings with severity ratings.
Yes, a devil's-advocate product management review checks for missing metrics and scope clarity by flagging unverifiable impact estimates and unclear boundaries. It delivers targeted questions and severity-rated issues to strengthen your product artifacts before team review.
A devil's-advocate critique for product requirements focuses strictly on identifying logical gaps, unsupported claims, and missing data rather than generating new product strategy. It provides severity-rated findings and suggested fixes but requires your team to implement the actual corrections.
coalesce-labsReview product documents to identify gaps, risks, and missing data.
sergicalParse Sentry bot comments in GitHub PRs to extract issues and suggested fixes.
omeragaakbasPrioritize product assumptions using an Impact × Risk matrix and propose experiments.
SALTYf1SHIdentify logical gaps, formatting issues, and unsupported claims in academic manuscripts.
