ralplan

Convert vague execution requests into structured consensus plans via Planner, Architect, and Critic.

1|Updated Mar 30, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Leap0920/Clean-Portfolio --skill ralplan-leap0920
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ralplan
Source: https://github.com/Leap0920/Clean-Portfolio/tree/main/%25USERPROFILE%25/.openclaude/plugins/cache/omc/oh-my-claudecode/4.14.0/skills/ralplan
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Leap0920/Clean-Portfolio --skill ralplan-leap0920

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Ralplan prevents vague or underspecified “run/executing” requests from starting expensive multi-agent work with unclear scope, by forcing a consensus planning pass first.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Consensus planning loop: Runs Planner → Architect → Critic until quality criteria are met and the plan is approved.
  • Risk-aware deliberation: In deliberate mode, adds pre-mortem scenarios and expanded test planning to reduce failure risk.
  • Optional interactive approval: Can present the draft plan for user review before any execution is authorized.
  • Strict planning/execution boundary: Produces and updates plan/spec/proposal artifacts but blocks mutation-oriented shell commands and delegation until explicit approval is captured.
  • Pre-execution gate for execution skills: Converts vague “ralph/autopilot/team” style intents into a structured plan with clear acceptance criteria.

Quick Start

Run /oh-my-claudecode:ralplan with your task description to get a consensus plan before execution.

Frequently Asked Questions about ralplan

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I prevent vague agent execution requests from triggering expensive multi-agent workflows?

Agent orchestration can prevent vague execution requests from triggering expensive multi-agent workflows by forcing a consensus planning pass first. A structured Planner, Architect, and Critic loop enforces quality criteria and optional interactive user approval before any execution begins.

What is the best way to structure an architecture review before authorizing high-stakes execution?

Architecture review is best structured through a consensus planning loop where an Architect evaluates the plan against quality criteria. This risk-aware deliberation adds pre-mortem scenarios and expanded test planning to minimize failure risk before interactive user approval.

How does consensus planning work for gating prompt safety and risk gating in agent orchestration?

Consensus planning gates prompt safety by sequentially running a Planner, Architect, and Critic until quality criteria are met. This sequential agent step execution avoids parallel architectural and critique calls, ensuring thorough risk gating before any execution.

Can I require interactive approval before an agent executes mutation-oriented shell commands?

Yes, interactive approval can be required before an agent executes mutation-oriented shell commands. A strict planning and execution boundary blocks mutations and delegation until explicit user approval is captured, marking all artifacts as pending.

When should I use a pre-execution gate for multi-agent test planning?

A pre-execution gate should be used for multi-agent test planning when facing high-stakes changes that require risk-aware deliberation. It converts vague intents into structured plans with clear acceptance criteria, adding pre-mortem scenarios to reduce failure risk.

Does this consensus planning approach block parallel architectural and critique calls?

Yes, this consensus planning approach blocks parallel architectural and critique calls by enforcing sequential agent step execution. The Planner, Architect, and Critic operate in sequence within the loop to maintain a strict boundary between planning and execution.