rcode-majlis-council

Multi-agent consultation coordinates specialist perspectives from strategy, product, engineering, and operations to resolve hard calls. It captures structured positions, highlights agreement and dissent, and synthesizes the discussion into a clear, auditable recommendation.

To orchestrate a council session for crisis response, convene the relevant specialists and define their authority boundaries. The system captures each structured position, reports alignment and dissent, and saves a session record for auditability.

Yes, you can capture explicit dissent during architecture reviews. The consultation requires structured position capture and generates an alignment and dissent report, ensuring minority perspectives are recorded rather than flattened into a single recommendation.

The best way to synthesize multi-agent positions is through structured decision synthesis. This mechanism captures each specialist's stance, maps areas of agreement and disagreement, and distills the cross-functional review into a single clear recommendation.

No, multi-agent orchestration requires predefined specialist authority boundaries. Setting these boundaries is necessary to structure the consultation, capture valid positions accurately, and maintain a reliable audit trail for the cross-functional decision.

You need a saved session record for multi-agent decisions whenever auditability is required, such as during incident response or roadmap tradeoffs. The record captures the structured consultation, specialist positions, and dissent reporting for later review.