rd-initiation-review

R&D project initiation review assesses proposals for novelty, feasibility, risk, and evidence completeness before advancing. It separates proposal claims from external sources, compares innovation points against public prior art, and outputs a traceable go, conditional go, or hold decision with identified gaps.

Evidence separation in proposal review distinguishes internal proposal claims from external public sources. It is needed to objectively validate novelty boundaries, identify missing evidence, and produce a traceable claim ledger that supports transparent go/no-go decision-making for committee audiences.

Checking a research proposal's novelty boundary involves comparing its innovation claims against existing technical routes and public prior art. The review identifies overlap boundaries and produces a novelty note that highlights concrete gaps and missing evidence before project initiation.

R&D initiation review applies to biotech, materials, software, and battery research proposals. It evaluates concrete project objects by performing feasibility and gap analysis, comparing innovation points against prior art, and generating committee-ready evaluation reports regardless of the specific technical domain.

R&D pre-screening evaluation produces traceable outputs including a review report, novelty note, and claim ledger. These documents record the go/no-go recommendation, innovation boundary comparisons, and missing-evidence lists required for management or committee decision-making.

Automated proposal audits should not be used when concrete project objects, defined innovation claims, or accessible prior art are unavailable. The review requires explicit evidence separation and feasibility data to generate accurate gap analysis and traceable committee-ready outputs.