re-audit-consolidation

Drift detection checks planning documents against actual filesystem state to identify stale claims, verified gaps, and newly discovered issues. It ensures documentation-versus-code drift is caught before implementation readiness reviews.

Independent audit consolidation handles reports from multiple agents covering schema, UI, business logic, and APIs. It compares conflicting percentages and produces a consensus range with clear go/no-go guidance for implementation readiness reviews.

Multi-agent audit consolidation works best when independent auditors report conflicting coverage numbers across schema, UI, business logic, and APIs. It reconciles these discrepancies and produces a consensus range with go/no-go recommendations.

During implementation readiness reviews, drift detection checks documentation against actual filesystem state to identify stale claims and verified gaps. It ensures the final coverage decision reflects code reality rather than outdated planning documents.

Yes, consolidating multiple independent audit reports produces go/no-go recommendations by reconciling conflicting coverage metrics and verifying actual filesystem state. This ensures the decision accounts for documentation-versus-code drift and remaining gaps.

Single-agent coverage estimates become unreliable when documentation, code reality, and coverage claims drift apart. They lack the reconciled consensus range and discrepancy explanation that multi-agent audit consolidation provides for defensible decisions.