realitycheck-analyze

Evidence evaluation is structured through a 3-stage Reality Check workflow: descriptive analysis to neutrally map claims, evaluative analysis to assess evidence quality and identify gaps, and dialectical analysis to synthesize counterarguments for reproducible results.

A manual reality check uses a 3-stage analysis workflow that produces reproducible analysis artifacts for manual review without automatic database registration, ensuring transparent evaluation of claims while keeping analyst control over conclusions.

Dialectical analysis is conducted in Stage 3 of the reality check workflow, where you steelman the strongest arguments, anticipate counterarguments, and map relationships between claims and sources to complete the evaluative synthesis.

Yes, the 3-stage claims evaluation workflow applies to research, journalism, and critical analysis tasks, guiding analysts through descriptive, evaluative, and dialectical stages to ensure careful manual inquiry before recording conclusions.

No external dependencies or database connections are required, as the reality check analysis is a manual workflow designed to produce reproducible analysis artifacts without committing claims to an automated knowledge base.

A structured 3-stage analysis ensures transparent and reproducible evaluation by enforcing a Descriptive to Evaluative to Dialectical workflow, preventing premature conclusions and mapping claim relationships before final synthesis.