Draft anonymous AI and ML conference rebuttals from reviewer comments and evidence.
npx skills add https://github.com/black-yt/skills --skill rebuttal-writing-black-yt
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: rebuttal-writing Source: https://github.com/black-yt/skills/tree/main/rebuttal-writing Command: npx skills add https://github.com/black-yt/skills --skill rebuttal-writing-black-yt
This Skill helps you turn scattered reviewer comments, rebuttal notes, and evidence into a clear, persuasive, and fully anonymous conference response. It is designed for situations where you need to answer criticism without sounding defensive, while keeping every claim grounded in the submitted paper.
Draft an anonymous rebuttal to these reviewer comments, organize each concern as Q1/Q2/Q3 with evidence-first answers, and add a separate private note for the area chair if any factual errors need to be documented.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
To write an anonymous AI conference rebuttal, you need to structure reviewer feedback into neutral Q&A pairs, ground every claim in your submitted paper's evidence, and maintain strict author anonymity throughout the response.
Address factual errors in a peer review by drafting a private, evidence-based note for the area chair, documenting the specific mistakes while maintaining a low-profile and neutral tone to avoid sounding defensive.
Format a word-limited ML conference rebuttal by converting sharp complaints into neutral research questions, organizing replies reviewer-by-reviewer, and using concise Markdown Q&A formatting to maximize evidence-first answers within constraints.
Yes, you can write separate responses. You can draft reviewer-by-reviewer replies with required greetings and neutral question titles, while also generating a distinct, low-profile private note for the area chair to document factual inconsistencies.
Reframe harsh reviewer criticism into neutral questions by converting sharp complaints into objective research questions, ensuring terminology aligns with the original paper, and prioritizing factual evidence over argumentative defense.
medusa-computeGenerate a structured conference paper rebuttal from reviewer feedback.
catlog22Parse reviewer comments and generate structured rebuttal and revision plans.
Tx1207Verify citation metadata against Google Scholar and WebSearch sources.
runtsangRefines NeurIPS Stage 2 rebuttal drafts into polished, reviewer-facing prose.
