rebuttal

Generate structured rebuttal documents for post-submission reviews.

Updated Jun 10, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/xqinag/ARIS-new --skill rebuttal-xqinag
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: rebuttal
Source: https://github.com/xqinag/ARIS-new/tree/main/skills/rebuttal
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/xqinag/ARIS-new --skill rebuttal-xqinag

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Automatically prepare and manage venue-compliant rebuttals to external reviews, ensuring grounded, provenance-backed responses and streamlined progress tracking.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Automates extraction and normalization of reviewer feedback into a structured rebuttal workflow.
  • Generates and tracks ISSUE_BOARD.md, STRATEGY_PLAN.md, REBUTTAL_DRAFT_v1.md, PASTE_READY.txt (single_document mode), and REVISION_PLAN.md.
  • Supports single_document and per_reviewer_thread modes, multi-round outreach, and safety checks to avoid ungrounded claims.
  • Fits venue constraints and enforces a framework of evidence over rhetoric to maximize clarity and compliance.
  • Useful for authors preparing rebuttals for ICML, NeurIPS, or other venues.

Quick Start

Provide the paper, reviews, and venue rules to initialize Phase 0 and generate the initial rebuttal artifacts.

Frequently Asked Questions about rebuttal

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I write a venue-compliant rebuttal for ICML or NeurIPS?

To write a venue-compliant rebuttal, provide your paper, reviews, and venue rules. The workflow extracts reviewer feedback, enforces evidence-based grounding, and generates a completion-ready document set.

What is the best way to track revision plans and address multi-round peer review threads?

Tracking revision plans and multi-round peer review threads is managed through a centralized REBUTTAL_STATE.md and REVISION_PLAN.md, supporting per-reviewer drafting and structured progress monitoring.

How do you ensure rebuttal drafts avoid ungrounded claims during academic writing?

To avoid ungrounded claims during academic writing, the rebuttal workflow enforces provenance and safety checks that block unverified claims, ensuring responses are strictly evidence-based.

Can I use a per-reviewer thread format instead of a single document for rebuttal drafting?

Yes, you can use per_reviewer_thread mode instead of single_document mode. Both formats support multi-round outreach and produce paste-ready text tailored to venue constraints.

What artifacts are generated when automating a structured rebuttal workflow?

Automating a structured rebuttal workflow generates ISSUE_BOARD.md, STRATEGY_PLAN.md, REBUTTAL_DRAFT_v1.md, PASTE_READY.txt, and REVISION_PLAN.md to track and organize responses.