receiving-code-review

Guide responding to external code review comments with verification and clarification steps.

1|Updated Jan 7, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/adamatdevops/forge-works --skill receiving-code-review-adamatdevops
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: receiving-code-review
Source: https://github.com/adamatdevops/forge-works/tree/main/.skills/obra/receiving-code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/adamatdevops/forge-works --skill receiving-code-review-adamatdevops

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

It helps you respond to pull request and code review feedback in a way that improves correctness without performing emotionally driven agreement or making unverified changes.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Verify before implementing: Checks feedback against the actual codebase and expected behavior for this specific repository.
  • Clarify unclear items first: Stops progress when any part of the feedback is ambiguous and asks targeted questions before touching code.
  • Respond with technical acknowledgment or reasoned pushback: Uses structured acknowledgement templates and avoids performative gratitude.

Quick Start

Ask the AI to convert the latest PR review comments into a step-by-step plan that clarifies unknowns, verifies technical claims against the repository, and produces the exact reply language to post inline.

Frequently Asked Questions about receiving-code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I handle pull request feedback that is unclear or potentially wrong?

Handle unclear or potentially wrong pull request feedback by applying a read-understand-verify-evaluate-respond-implement approach. Stop progress on ambiguous items and ask targeted clarification questions before making any code changes.

What is the best way to respond to code review comments without just agreeing?

Respond to code review comments without performative agreement by using structured technical acknowledgment templates. Evaluate feedback against repository reality and provide reasoned pushback when claims are incorrect or unverified.

How do I verify code review feedback against my actual codebase?

Verify code review feedback against your actual codebase by checking the requested changes against repository reality, expected behavior, and test validation. Ensure feedback claims are technically correct before implementing the suggested fixes.

Can I convert PR review comments into a step-by-step implementation plan?

You can convert PR review comments into a step-by-step plan by processing feedback to clarify unknowns, verify technical claims against the repository, and produce exact reply language to post inline on the pull request.

When should I ask for clarification on code review feedback?

Ask for clarification on code review feedback immediately when any part of the review item is ambiguous. Stop progress and request targeted questions before touching code to avoid implementing unverified or incorrect changes.

Why does implementing code review feedback directly sometimes break tests?

Implementing code review feedback directly can break tests when changes are made without verifying technical claims against repository reality. Always validate feedback through testing discipline and codebase checks before applying fixes.