receiving-code-review

Guides verification and implementation of code review feedback with technical rigor.

2|Updated Aug 15, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Grupo-6-ADS-B/FittNutri --skill receiving-code-review-grupo-6-ads-b
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: receiving-code-review
Source: https://github.com/Grupo-6-ADS-B/FittNutri/tree/main/.claude/skills/receiving-code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Grupo-6-ADS-B/FittNutri --skill receiving-code-review-grupo-6-ads-b

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Receiving code review feedback often leads to two failure modes: performative agreement without verification, or blind implementation of suggestions that may break the codebase. This Skill enforces a disciplined response pattern so feedback is evaluated technically before any code changes are made. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Structured Response Pattern: Read, understand, verify against the codebase, evaluate, respond, then implement one item at a time with individual testing. - Source-Specific Handling: Different protocols for trusted human partner feedback versus external reviewer suggestions, including YAGNI checks for unused features. - Pushback Guidance: Rules for when and how to push back with technical reasoning, plus how to gracefully correct yourself when your pushback was wrong. - Use Case: A reviewer suggests removing legacy code. Instead of agreeing immediately, you verify the build target and discover the legacy path is needed for backward compatibility, then respond with the technical finding. ## Quick Start Apply the receiving-code-review skill to evaluate and respond to the review comments on my current pull request.

Frequently Asked Questions about receiving-code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How should I respond to code review feedback as a developer?

Read the complete feedback, restate the requirement in your own words, verify it against the actual codebase, then implement one item at a time with individual testing. Avoid performative agreement phrases and let the code changes demonstrate you understood.

How do I handle unclear code review comments?

Stop and ask for clarification before implementing anything, even if other items are clear. Partial understanding leads to wrong implementations because feedback items are often related.

When should I push back on a code review suggestion?

Push back when a suggestion breaks existing functionality, violates YAGNI for unused features, is technically incorrect for your stack, or conflicts with prior architectural decisions. Use technical reasoning and reference working code or tests.

Should I implement every suggestion from external reviewers?

No. External feedback is a suggestion to evaluate, not an order. Check whether it is technically correct for your codebase, breaks existing functionality, and whether the reviewer understands the full context before implementing.

How do I reply to inline review comments on GitHub pull requests?

Reply within the comment thread using the GitHub API replies endpoint for that comment ID, not as a top-level PR comment. This keeps the discussion attached to the specific code line being reviewed.