recht-evidence

Name: recht-evidence
Availability: InStock
Author: Momo

Analyze Austrian civil procedure evidence strength and admissibility under ZPO.

1|Updated Apr 9, 2026

Search Tags:#evidence #zpo #austrian-law #burden-of-proof #privaturkunde #zeugen #sachverständige

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/MoMarcode1/austrian-legal-claude --skill recht-evidence

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: recht-evidence
Source: https://github.com/MoMarcode1/austrian-legal-claude/tree/main/skills/recht-evidence
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/MoMarcode1/austrian-legal-claude --skill recht-evidence

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps practitioners quickly assess the strength and admissibility of evidence under Austrian civil procedure (ZPO), flagging gaps and potential weaknesses.

Core Features & Use Cases

Evidence type classification: identify and categorize each piece of evidence according to ZPO (öffentliche Urkunde, privaturkunde, zeugen, sachverständige, beweise)
Strength assessment: rate each item as strong, moderate, or weak and outline challenges to authenticity or admissibility
Gaps and remedies: propose actions to shore up the evidentiary record (additional documents, witnesses, or expert reports)
RIS verification integration: verify cited laws and case references via the RIS protocol and record Quellenstatus
Burden of proof guidance: clarify who must prove each fact and what must be proven

Quick Start

Provide the case facts and available documents, and ask the Skill to assess evidentiary strength under ZPO.

Frequently Asked Questions about recht-evidence

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I assess evidence strength under Austrian civil procedure ZPO?▼

To assess evidence strength under Austrian ZPO, provide your case facts and available documents to receive evidence-type classification, strength ratings, burden-of-proof guidance, and gap analysis recommendations.

What is the burden of proof guidance for Austrian civil law cases?▼

Burden of proof guidance in Austrian civil law clarifies which party must prove each specific fact and precisely outlines what elements must be proven to satisfy the ZPO evidentiary requirements.

How do I verify Austrian legal references and case law using RIS?▼

To verify Austrian legal references using RIS, the system applies the RIS protocol to check cited laws and case references, recording the Quellenstatus to ensure your evidence assessment relies on valid jurisprudence.

How do I classify private documents and witness statements in Austrian ZPO?▼

To classify private documents and witness statements in Austrian ZPO, identify and categorize each item according to evidence types like Privaturkunde, Zeugen, or Sachverständige, then evaluate their respective admissibility and strength.

Can I use this to find evidentiary gaps in an Austrian civil procedure case?▼

Yes, you can use this to find evidentiary gaps in an Austrian civil procedure case by analyzing your current evidentiary record to receive proposed actions, such as obtaining additional documents, witnesses, or expert reports.

What are the limitations of automated evidence admissibility analysis in Austrian law?▼

Automated evidence admissibility analysis in Austrian law is limited to evaluating provided case facts and documents, meaning it cannot independently discover new evidence or replace professional legal judgment for complex litigation strategies.