records-hygiene

Detect lifecycle record drift across ADL surfaces and emit structured findings.

4|1|Updated Feb 3, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/danielbaustin/agent-design-language --skill records-hygiene
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: records-hygiene
Source: https://github.com/danielbaustin/agent-design-language/tree/main/adl/tools/skills/records-hygiene
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/danielbaustin/agent-design-language --skill records-hygiene

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Scan ADL lifecycle records for truth drift, report bounded machine-readable findings, and optionally apply narrow safe repairs.

Core Features & Use Cases

This skill provides deterministic drift detection across STP, SIP, SOR, and related workflow evidence, producing structured findings that can drive follow-on improvements and handoffs. It classifies findings by safety/ambiguity, emits evidence, and supports bounded repairs when explicitly allowed without broad repo changes. Use cases include verifying status consistency, identifying placeholder drift, and aligning PR/run evidence with surface targets.

Quick Start

Resolve the concrete target and run the drift analyzer to produce a structured findings report.

Frequently Asked Questions about records-hygiene

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I detect lifecycle record drift across ADL surfaces like STP, SIP, and SOR?

You can detect lifecycle record drift by scanning ADL surfaces like STP, SIP, and SOR against concrete targets such as issues, branches, or worktrees, producing a structured findings artifact with validation data and handoff guidance.

What is the best way to identify placeholder drift and status inconsistencies in workflow evidence?

Identifying placeholder drift and status inconsistencies is handled by running a deterministic drift analyzer that classifies findings by safety and ambiguity, emitting evidence to drive follow-on improvements and handoffs.

Can I automatically apply safe repairs when unambiguous workflow drift is detected?

Yes, you can apply narrow safe repairs when unambiguous drift is detected by supplying explicit policy controls, allowing mechanical corrections to bounded targets without executing broad repository changes.

What inputs do I need to provide to run an ADL drift analysis on a repository?

To run an ADL drift analysis, you must provide inputs for the repository root, target surface, policy controls, and output formats to generate a structured findings artifact containing validation data and handoff guidance.

How does the drift analyzer classify findings to ensure safe mechanical repairs?

The drift analyzer classifies findings by safety and ambiguity, ensuring that only unambiguous drift is eligible for bounded mechanical repairs, while ambiguous issues are reported with evidence for manual review.