records-retention-mapper

Map municipal record series to retention periods, custody, sensitivity, and disposition steps.

Updated Mar 30, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/BrianPillmore/MayorGPT --skill records-retention-mapper
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: records-retention-mapper
Source: https://github.com/BrianPillmore/MayorGPT/tree/main/skills/data-and-research/records-retention-mapper
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/BrianPillmore/MayorGPT --skill records-retention-mapper

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Map city record series to required retention periods, custody locations, sensitivity classifications, and disposition steps — using the state retention schedule, local policy, and any applicable litigation-hold or audit-hold constraints.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Determine retention periods by record series from state schedules and local policies.
  • Flag holds (litigation, audit, public records) and propose disposition paths (archive, destruction, or transfer).
  • Produce a consolidated retention map with custody, sensitivity, and disposition for audit-ready reporting.

Quick Start

Provide a city records inventory and applicable schedules to generate a retention map for each series.

Frequently Asked Questions about records-retention-mapper

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I map municipal records to required retention periods and disposition steps?

Municipal records retention mapping assigns retention periods, custody locations, sensitivity classifications, and disposition steps by applying state schedules and local policies to each record series. It outputs an action-ready disposition plan for archive, destruction, or transfer.

What happens to records retention schedules when a litigation hold or audit hold is active?

Records retention schedules must be overridden when active holds are flagged. The mapping process identifies litigation, audit, and public records holds, suspending standard disposition paths and proposing hold-aware retention attributes until constraints are cleared.

Can I classify record sensitivity and custody locations across multiple city departments?

City record series can be classified by sensitivity and custody location across multiple departments. The mapping workflow collects source material from each department, assigns retention attributes, and consolidates them into an audit-ready retention map.

How do I identify gaps in my municipal records inventory before disposition?

Identifying records inventory gaps requires mapping each record series against state retention schedules and local policies. The structured workflow flags missing retention attributes, unmatched series, and unapplied holds to produce a complete disposition plan.

What is the best way to generate an audit-ready records disposition plan for local government?

An audit-ready records disposition plan is generated by consolidating state schedule retention periods, local policies, hold constraints, custody locations, and sensitivity classifications into a single retention map for each municipal record series.

Does this records retention mapping approach handle open public records requests?

Open public records requests are handled as hold constraints within the retention mapping workflow. The process flags public records requests alongside litigation and audit holds, adjusting disposition paths and sensitivity classifications to ensure compliant responses.