red-blue-validator

Run iterative Red/Blue validation rounds to surface hidden risks in propositions.

2|1|Updated Jan 31, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Agentient/vibekit --skill red-blue-validator
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: red-blue-validator
Source: https://github.com/Agentient/vibekit/tree/main/plugins/evaluation-tools/skills/red-blue-validator
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Agentient/vibekit --skill red-blue-validator

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill enables teams to uncover hidden risks in propositions by conducting iterative Red/Blue validation, surfacing weaknesses before commitments.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Systematic adversarial cycles: Red Team attacks with steel-manned reasoning and Blue Team defenses, iterating until convergence criteria are met.
  • Convergence-driven outputs: Generates risk assessments, hardened propositions, and attack/defense logs for decision governance.
  • Domain applicability: Suitable for decisions, strategy, architecture, plans, and policy validations across product, security, and investment domains.

Quick Start

Provide a battle-tested proposition by cycling Red/Blue validation until convergence is achieved.

Frequently Asked Questions about red-blue-validator

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
What is adversarial validation and how does it surface hidden risks in a strategy?

Adversarial validation is a systematic process that stress-tests propositions by running iterative Red Team attacks and Blue Team defenses, surfacing hidden risks in strategies before commitments are made.

How do I run Red Team and Blue Team validation cycles to stress-test an architecture plan?

Provide your architecture plan to trigger iterative Red/Blue validation cycles. Red Teams steel-man attacks while Blue Teams defend, iterating until convergence criteria are met and a hardened proposition is generated.

Can I use this adversarial validation process for investment and product decisions?

Yes, adversarial validation is applicable across product, security, and investment domains. It systematically stress-tests decisions, strategies, architectures, plans, and policies to surface hidden weaknesses.

What convergence criteria and artifacts are produced when battle-testing decisions?

Battle-testing decisions generates convergence-driven outputs including structured artifacts like attack and defense logs, comprehensive risk assessments, and hardened propositions for decision governance.

Does this Red/Blue decision governance approach require any specific frameworks or dependencies?

No specific frameworks or dependencies are required to run Red/Blue decision governance. You only need to provide a initial proposition to begin the iterative attack and defense validation cycles.

When should I not use iterative Red/Blue validation for risk assessment?

Iterative Red/Blue validation is designed for complex propositions requiring decision governance, so it may be excessive for simple, low-risk tasks that do not warrant structured attack and defense cycles.