red-pen

Review written content for language, typography, and AI-generated issues.

7|Updated Oct 20, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/borkweb/skills --skill red-pen
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: red-pen
Source: https://github.com/borkweb/skills/tree/main/skills/core/red-pen
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/borkweb/skills --skill red-pen

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill offers a strict editorial review that enhances the clarity, precision, and style of written content, ensuring it adheres to high-quality standards.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Editorial Review: Provides a detailed review of writing, focusing on language, typography, and AI-generated content detection.
  • Customizable Feedback: Offers specific feedback on dead metaphors, unnecessary words, passive voice, and more.
  • Interactive Review: Allows users to interactively choose between suggested edits or provide their own.

Quick Start

Use the red-pen skill to review the draft of your latest report.

Frequently Asked Questions about red-pen

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I get editorial feedback on written content to fix passive voice and dead metaphors?

An editorial review identifies issues like dead metaphors, passive voice, and unnecessary words in your written content. It provides detailed language and typography corrections while detecting AI-generated text, allowing you to interactively choose between suggested edits or provide your own.

Can I check my writing to detect if it contains AI-generated content?

Yes, you can check your writing for AI-generated content during the editorial review process. The review specifically identifies AI-generated text while also evaluating language precision and typography, allowing you to interactively accept suggested edits or provide your own corrections.

What is the best way to refine written work and ensure it meets high-quality language standards?

The best way to refine written work is to use a strict editorial review that provides customizable feedback on language and typography. It identifies specific issues like unnecessary words and allows you to interactively choose between suggested edits or provide your own corrections to ensure high-quality standards.

Does this editorial review support interactive feedback for choosing between suggested language corrections?

Yes, the editorial review supports interactive feedback for choosing between suggested language corrections. You can interactively select from suggested edits for issues like dead metaphors and passive voice, or provide your own alternative corrections during the refinement process.

Do I need a specific model to perform a typography check and detailed language correction?

Yes, you need a model capable of understanding and providing detailed feedback on written text to perform a typography check and language correction. This requirement ensures the editorial review can accurately identify and correct issues related to language precision and style.

What types of typography and language issues does a strict editorial review identify?

A strict editorial review identifies typography issues, dead metaphors, unnecessary words, and passive voice. It provides customizable feedback on these specific language issues, ensuring your written content achieves the clarity and precision required for high-quality editorial standards.