Identifies weaknesses and constructs steelman plus counter-argument for structured critique.
npx skills add https://github.com/jwm-axoni/auggie-pai --skill red-team-jwm-axoni
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: red-team Source: https://github.com/jwm-axoni/auggie-pai/tree/main/skills/red-team Command: npx skills add https://github.com/jwm-axoni/auggie-pai --skill red-team-jwm-axoni
Adversarial analysis that breaks arguments into atomic components, attacks from multiple expert perspectives, and produces devastating counter-arguments while first building the strongest possible version of the argument (steelman).
Run a parallel analysis to identify weaknesses and craft a steelman plus the strongest counter-argument.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
A steelman is the strongest possible version of an argument constructed before attacking it. Building a steelman ensures your adversarial critique tests the most robust interpretation, making the resulting counter-arguments significantly more rigorous and reliable.
To generate a strong counter-argument, the analysis first constructs a steelman of your policy position, then mounts a multi-perspective attack from expert viewpoints. This produces a structured critique and a formal verdict on the argument's robustness.
Yes, this structured critique applies specifically to policy, product design, and technical debates. It validates designs by applying multiple expert perspectives to ensure rigorous testing across complex technical requirements and architectural decisions.
Yes, the analysis outputs a formal verdict alongside the steelman and counter-arguments. This verdict synthesizes the structured critique to explicitly determine whether the original argument survives the multi-perspective adversarial stress test.
Building a steelman ensures your adversarial critique tests the most robust interpretation of the argument. Constructing the strongest possible version before mounting an attack makes the resulting counter-arguments significantly more rigorous and reliable.
phatblatAnalyze arguments and ideas with a 32-agent parallel critique framework.
Steffen025Orchestrate 32 agents to critique arguments and produce steelman and counter-arguments.
cybersecwomanGuide bug bounty hunting through a five-phase workflow with critical thinking frameworks.
RooseveltAdvisorsAnalyze arguments and proposals with a 32-agent parallel framework.
