red-team-review-welding

Red-team review of welding power supply code identifies timing races and RTOS scheduling pressures after patches. It applies to critical modules, including 250 µs EtherCAT or 1 ms degraded fallback paths, to uncover worst-case behaviors and demand evidence.

A red-team review for welding power supply safety invariants is an independent adversarial code review. It detects hardware path disable logic issues and unsafe state transitions, verifying alignment with welded safety core baselines rather than rewriting code.

Generate fault-injection scenarios for PWM and ADC failure paths by running a red-team review after changes to fault paths. The review produces a prioritized risk list with reproduction steps, required tests, and recommended minimal fixes.

You need an adversarial review for EtherCAT and COMX ownership paths after any patch or PR changes timing, fault paths, or ownership logic. It targets critical modules to reveal ISR/DMA contention and requires measurements as proof.

This review approach works without modifying the existing power supply codebase because it focuses on finding issues and demanding evidence. It outputs a prioritized list of risks with reproduction steps and proposed minimal fixes instead of rewriting code.

A limitation of this red-team review is that it does not rewrite code or fix issues directly. It only identifies and documents failure scenarios, timing risks, and safety invariant violations, requiring developers to implement the recommended minimal fixes.