Red-Team Review

Identify bias, ethical, and safety risks in artifacts before release.

558|75|Updated Dec 18, 2025

Search Tags:#risk-assessment #quality-assurance #red-team #adversarial-review #bias-check #artifact-review

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/winstonkoh87/Athena-Public --skill red-team-review-winstonkoh87

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: Red-Team Review
Source: https://github.com/winstonkoh87/Athena-Public/tree/main/examples/skills/quality/red-team-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/winstonkoh87/Athena-Public --skill red-team-review-winstonkoh87

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Bias-aware adversarial review reduces risk by surfacing missed issues before release and helps ensure responsible artifacts.

Core Features & Use Cases

5-phase QA protocol with severity-weighted findings.
Perspectives-driven bias checks and exception handling for artifacts like prompts, docs, and code.
Use Case: pre-release audit of product specs, marketing content, and policy documents.

Quick Start

Paste the artifact you want reviewed and initiate a red-team assessment to surface biases, gaps, and risks.

Frequently Asked Questions about Red-Team Review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I run a bias check on documents before release?▼

A bias check for documents before release uses a 5-phase QA protocol to surface ethical and safety risks, applying severity-weighted findings and explicit mitigation suggestions to your pasted artifact.

What is adversarial review in quality assurance?▼

Adversarial review in quality assurance is a perspectives-driven assessment that identifies and surfaces bias, ethical risks, and safety gaps in artifacts like prompts, docs, and code before they ship.

Can I use red-team assessment for code and policy documents?▼

Yes, you can use this red-team assessment for code and policy documents, as it applies perspectives-driven bias checks and exception handling across development cycles including drafts and proposals.

How do I identify ethical risks in product specs?▼

To identify ethical risks in product specs, apply a 5-phase QA protocol that delivers severity-weighted findings and explicit mitigation suggestions for responsible artifact release.

What is the best way to audit marketing content for bias?▼

The best way to audit marketing content for bias is through an adversarial review that applies severity-weighted findings and perspectives-driven checks to surface missed issues before publication.

When do I need a pre-release risk assessment for artifacts?▼

You need a pre-release risk assessment for artifacts when you want to ensure responsible outputs by reducing risk and surfacing missed bias, ethical, and safety issues before shipping.