red-team-testing

Probe AI model boundaries and test guardrails against adversarial attack scenarios.

2|Updated Jan 15, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/DTMC-marketplace/governance --skill red-team-testing
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: red-team-testing
Source: https://github.com/DTMC-marketplace/governance/tree/main/skills/red-team-testing
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/DTMC-marketplace/governance --skill red-team-testing

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill addresses the critical need to proactively identify safety failures and vulnerabilities in AI systems through rigorous adversarial testing.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Adversarial Testing: Design and execute attack scenarios to probe AI model boundaries and test guardrails.
  • Vulnerability Documentation: Systematically document identified weaknesses and safety failures.
  • Compliance Assessment: Evaluate AI systems against specific EU AI Act requirements (Art. 9, Art. 15) related to health and safety.
  • Use Case: A team developing a new AI chatbot can use this skill to simulate malicious user inputs designed to elicit harmful or biased responses, ensuring the system is robust before deployment.

Quick Start

Use the red-team-testing skill to assess compliance with EU AI Act Art. 9 and Art. 15.

Frequently Asked Questions about red-team-testing

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I identify AI safety failures before deploying a chatbot?

Adversarial testing identifies AI safety failures by simulating malicious user inputs to probe model boundaries and test guardrails. This methodology systematically probes your AI system to elicit harmful or biased responses, ensuring robustness before deployment.

What is red teaming for AI systems and when do I need it?

Red teaming is an adversarial testing methodology that probes AI model boundaries to identify vulnerabilities. You need it when evaluating AI systems for safety failures, specifically to ensure the system does not generate harmful or biased outputs when subjected to attack scenarios.

How do I test AI guardrails against malicious inputs?

You test AI guardrails by designing and executing specific attack scenarios that simulate malicious user inputs. This process probes the model boundaries to see if the guardrails hold, allowing you to document any safety failures or vulnerabilities.

Does adversarial testing help with EU AI Act compliance?

Yes, adversarial testing facilitates compliance assessment against EU AI Act requirements. It specifically evaluates AI systems for health and safety assessments required by Article 9 and Article 15, documenting vulnerabilities to ensure regulatory alignment.

Can I use this methodology to document AI vulnerabilities systematically?

Yes, you can use this adversarial testing methodology to systematically document identified weaknesses. It provides a structured approach to record safety failures and vulnerabilities found during the probing of model boundaries and guardrails.

What are the limitations of relying on attack scenarios for AI vulnerability assessment?

Attack scenarios probe specific model boundaries but may not uncover every vulnerability. The methodology focuses on simulating malicious inputs to document safety failures, meaning untested edge cases or novel attack vectors could remain unidentified after the assessment.