RedTeam

Analyzes arguments and surfaces weaknesses using automated multi-perspective review.

1|Updated Mar 11, 2026

Search Tags:#vulnerability assessment #red team #stress test #counter-argument #adversarial analysis #argument critique

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/BishopCodes/OpenPAI --skill redteam-bishopcodes

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: RedTeam
Source: https://github.com/BishopCodes/OpenPAI/tree/main/skills/Thinking/RedTeam
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/BishopCodes/OpenPAI --skill redteam-bishopcodes

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) and scripts (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides a rigorous adversarial analysis framework to identify vulnerabilities, hidden assumptions, and fatal flaws in arguments, strategies, or proposals, ensuring robust decision-making.

Core Features & Use Cases

Adversarial Analysis: Employs 32 specialized agents to attack arguments from multiple perspectives (engineering, architecture, pentesting, fresh insights).
Decomposition & Synthesis: Breaks down complex arguments into atomic claims and synthesizes findings into a steelman and a devastating counter-argument.
Use Case: Before launching a new product strategy, use RedTeam to stress-test the plan, identify potential failure points, and refine the approach based on critical feedback.

Quick Start

Use the RedTeam skill to red team this microservices migration plan.

Frequently Asked Questions about RedTeam

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

What is adversarial analysis and how does it find hidden assumptions in a proposal?▼

Adversarial analysis decomposes arguments into atomic claims and deploys parallel agents to critique them, synthesizing findings into a steelman and counter-argument to expose vulnerabilities and hidden assumptions.

How do I stress test a product strategy before launch?▼

Stress test a product strategy by running it through a multi-agent framework that attacks the plan from engineering, architecture, and pentesting perspectives, then refine your approach based on the synthesized critical feedback.

Can I use a multi-agent framework to generate counter-arguments for technical proposals?▼

Yes, you can use a multi-agent framework to generate counter-arguments by decomposing technical proposals, applying parallel agent critiques, steelmanning the strongest points, and synthesizing a devastating counter-argument.

What is the best way to critique a microservices migration plan?▼

The best way to critique a microservices migration plan is through rigorous red teaming, which identifies potential failure points and fatal flaws by attacking the architecture and engineering assumptions from adversarial perspectives.

Does this adversarial analysis approach work for validating new content creation?▼

Yes, this approach supports adversarial validation for new content creation by stress-testing the underlying arguments and proposals during the drafting phase to ensure logical robustness before publication.

When should I not use red teaming for argument critique?▼

Avoid using red teaming for argument critique when dealing with straightforward, low-stakes decisions where the overhead of multi-agent decomposition outweighs the benefit of identifying potential failure points.