redteam

Adversarial review generates targeted failing tests by reading your source code and writing tests that break on discovered weaknesses, without touching implementation. It exposes vulnerabilities, architectural gaps, and test gaps through failing test output.

Adversarial code review treats you as the adversary aiming to break things. It reads source code, generates new failing tests targeting security edge cases and architectural conformance gaps, and reports findings without fixing or modifying the underlying implementation.

Yes, adversarial security testing works in CI pipelines via environment variables. It reads source code, generates failing tests that expose weaknesses, and reports findings through the configured toolset, fitting standalone projects and automated pipeline contexts.

Architecture conformance checking generates failing tests that expose structural gaps without modifying production code. It reads your source, detects stubs, validates architectural conformance, and reports weaknesses through targeted test failures rather than implementation changes.

Adversarial review focuses exclusively on breaking code rather than fixing it. It generates targeted failing tests to expose vulnerabilities, architectural conformance gaps, and security edge cases, whereas standard code review typically suggests fixes rather than demonstrating failures.