RedTeam

Name: RedTeam
Availability: InStock
Author: starlink-awaken

Decompose arguments into 24 atomic claims and synthesize steelman and counter-argument critiques.

1|Updated Jun 10, 2026

Search Tags:#quality-assurance #content-evaluation #critical-thinking #decision-support #parallel-agents #adversarial-analysis

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/starlink-awaken/pai-universal --skill redteam-starlink-awaken

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: RedTeam
Source: https://github.com/starlink-awaken/pai-universal/tree/main/templates/packs/RedTeam/src
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/starlink-awaken/pai-universal --skill redteam-starlink-awaken

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

RedTeam provides rigorous adversarial analysis by deploying 32 expert agents to critique ideas, stress-test arguments, and surface hidden assumptions, strengthening conclusions.

Core Features & Use Cases

ParallelAnalysis workflow: stress-tests existing content by decomposing arguments into 24 atomic claims, analyzing with 32 agents, then producing steelman and counter-arguments.
AdversarialValidation workflow: compares competing proposals and synthesizes a superior final solution.
Context references: Philosophy.md and Integration.md explain how to combine with FirstPrinciples, Council, and other skills for auditable outputs.
Note: RedTeam is intentional about evaluating ideas, not probing systems for vulnerabilities.

Quick Start

Invoke the ParallelAnalysis workflow on an argument to generate a steelman and a counter-argument.

Frequently Asked Questions about RedTeam

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

What is adversarial analysis and how does it stress-test an argument?▼

Adversarial analysis stress-tests an argument by decomposing it into 24 atomic claims to surface hidden assumptions, deploying 32 agents across four personas to critique strengths and weaknesses in parallel, and synthesizing a steelman and counter-argument.

How do I generate a steelman and counter-argument for an existing proposal?▼

To generate a steelman and counter-argument, invoke the ParallelAnalysis workflow on your argument; it decomposes the core argument into atomic claims, analyzes them with parallel agents, and delivers an auditable, decision-support-ready output.

Can I use this approach to compare and validate two competing proposals?▼

Yes, you can use the AdversarialValidation workflow to compare competing proposals and synthesize a superior final solution, providing an auditable output for decision support.

Does this adversarial analysis method probe systems for security vulnerabilities?▼

No, this adversarial analysis method does not probe systems for security vulnerabilities; it is intentionally designed for evaluating ideas, stress-testing arguments, and surfacing hidden assumptions.

How do I combine critical thinking analysis with other decision-support frameworks?▼

You can combine critical thinking analysis with other frameworks by referencing Philosophy.md and Integration.md, which explain how to integrate with FirstPrinciples, Council, and other skills for auditable outputs.