skills.rest
starlink-awaken
starlink-awakenCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

RedTeam

Decompose arguments into 24 atomic claims and synthesize steelman and counter-argument critiques.

1|Updated Jun 10, 2026
Search Tags:#quality-assurance#content-evaluation#critical-thinking#decision-support#parallel-agents#adversarial-analysis
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/starlink-awaken/pai-universal --skill redteam-starlink-awaken
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: RedTeam
Source: https://github.com/starlink-awaken/pai-universal/tree/main/templates/packs/RedTeam/src
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/starlink-awaken/pai-universal --skill redteam-starlink-awaken

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

RedTeam provides rigorous adversarial analysis by deploying 32 expert agents to critique ideas, stress-test arguments, and surface hidden assumptions, strengthening conclusions.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • ParallelAnalysis workflow: stress-tests existing content by decomposing arguments into 24 atomic claims, analyzing with 32 agents, then producing steelman and counter-arguments.
  • AdversarialValidation workflow: compares competing proposals and synthesizes a superior final solution.
  • Context references: Philosophy.md and Integration.md explain how to combine with FirstPrinciples, Council, and other skills for auditable outputs.
  • Note: RedTeam is intentional about evaluating ideas, not probing systems for vulnerabilities.

Quick Start

Invoke the ParallelAnalysis workflow on an argument to generate a steelman and a counter-argument.

Frequently Asked Questions about RedTeam

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
What is adversarial analysis and how does it stress-test an argument?▼

Adversarial analysis stress-tests an argument by decomposing it into 24 atomic claims to surface hidden assumptions, deploying 32 agents across four personas to critique strengths and weaknesses in parallel, and synthesizing a steelman and counter-argument.

How do I generate a steelman and counter-argument for an existing proposal?▼

To generate a steelman and counter-argument, invoke the ParallelAnalysis workflow on your argument; it decomposes the core argument into atomic claims, analyzes them with parallel agents, and delivers an auditable, decision-support-ready output.

Can I use this approach to compare and validate two competing proposals?▼

Yes, you can use the AdversarialValidation workflow to compare competing proposals and synthesize a superior final solution, providing an auditable output for decision support.

Does this adversarial analysis method probe systems for security vulnerabilities?▼

No, this adversarial analysis method does not probe systems for security vulnerabilities; it is intentionally designed for evaluating ideas, stress-testing arguments, and surfacing hidden assumptions.

How do I combine critical thinking analysis with other decision-support frameworks?▼

You can combine critical thinking analysis with other frameworks by referencing Philosophy.md and Integration.md, which explain how to integrate with FirstPrinciples, Council, and other skills for auditable outputs.

Related Skills

Explore More Education & Research Skills→
shiroginshirogin
1

business-context

Capture project identity, principles, stakeholders, boundaries, and success criteria.

Community
Advanced
pynbj1001pynbj1001
4

RedTeam

Coordinate 32 agents to critique arguments and synthesize convergent insights.

Community
Advanced
ylxaiylxai
2

RedTeam

Identify vulnerabilities in ideas, strategies, and plans via 32-agent adversarial analysis.

Community
Advanced
alpoxdevalpoxdev
3

bug-fix

Analyze bugs, propose remediation options, and implement fixes with validation.

Community
Advanced