refactor

Plan code refactoring by mapping architecture, tracing dependencies, and preserving behavior.

Updated Aug 23, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/CuongTran69/tramthientra --skill refactor-cuongtran69
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: refactor
Source: https://github.com/CuongTran69/tramthientra/tree/main/.augment/skills/refactor
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/CuongTran69/tramthientra --skill refactor-cuongtran69

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps teams and engineers plan, scope, and implement code refactors while preserving behavior and minimizing risk by guiding exploration, impact assessment, and implementation planning.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Exploration & Scoping: Restate goals (Feynman Echo), ask clarifying questions, challenge assumptions, and map the exact scope of the refactor.
  • Impact Assessment: Trace dependencies, map architecture before/after, surface hidden complexity, and classify behavior-preservation risks and required tests.
  • Decision & Implementation Planning: Compare refactoring options, sketch tradeoffs, recommend a path, optionally produce a spec and test strategy.
  • Use Case: Take a legacy PaymentsService with brittle module boundaries and produce an actionable refactor plan that names files, identifies integration points, prescribes tests, and lists unknowns to spike.

Quick Start

Use the refactor skill to explore and produce a safe implementation plan and test strategy for refactoring the PaymentsService module.

Frequently Asked Questions about refactor

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I plan a code refactoring without breaking existing behavior?

Code refactoring requires mapping architecture before and after, tracing dependencies, and defining a behavior preservation strategy. You produce an explicit affected-file list and a zero-fog checklist to verify no functionality changes during the refactor.

What's the best way to assess risk before refactoring a legacy module?

Risk assessment for legacy module refactoring involves classifying behavior-preservation risks, surfacing hidden complexity, and identifying integration points. You trace dependencies across the architecture to map exact scope and prescribe required tests for affected files.

Does this approach work for cross-module refactors or only component-level changes?

This refactoring approach applies to both component-level and cross-module refactors. It handles architecture mapping and dependency tracing across module boundaries, ensuring behavior preservation and test strategy coverage for complex, multi-file integration points.

How do I scope a refactor when module boundaries are brittle?

Scoping brittle module boundaries requires restating goals, asking clarifying questions, and challenging assumptions. You map the exact refactor scope, compare refactoring options, sketch tradeoffs, and list unknowns to spike before implementation.

What test strategy do I need when refactoring a PaymentsService module?

A refactoring test strategy classifies behavior-preservation risks and prescribes specific tests for affected files and integration points. You produce a concrete implementation plan naming files, identifying test coverage requirements, and listing unknowns to spike.

Why do I need a dependency tracing step in my refactoring plan?

Dependency tracing in refactoring plans surfaces hidden complexity and maps architecture before and after changes. It identifies integration points across module boundaries, ensuring your affected-file list accurately captures all behavior-preservation risks and required tests.