refactor-plan

A multi-file refactor requires a sequenced execution plan that identifies affected files, maps dependency chains, and breaks modifications into ordered phases for types, implementations, and tests. This structured approach coordinates safe modifications across interdependent modules.

Sequencing code migrations safely means ordering changes into distinct phases: types and interfaces first, then implementations, followed by tests and cleanup. This phased process includes verification checks between each step to ensure legacy types and test suites remain functional.

Creating rollback steps for an API migration involves defining precise recovery procedures within your execution plan before applying changes. You map explicit dependency mappings and establish verification checks to trigger immediate rollback in case of regression.

Yes, a phased refactor plan is designed specifically for repositories with complex dependency chains and interdependent modules. It performs affected-file discovery to identify all impacted imports and coordinates safe modifications across the entire dependency tree.

To verify implementation changes during a multi-file code refactor, you define explicit verification checks between each sequenced phase. These checks validate that type updates, implementation modifications, and test coverage pass before proceeding to the next phase.

Planning large refactors without explicit dependency mappings risks breaking functionality because missing imports and improper sequencing go undetected. Without structured verification and rollback steps, inadequate dependency analysis slows recovery and introduces regression risks.