What problem does it solve?
Refactoring keeps implementation quality from decaying between releases. It is justified when reviews, tech-debt evidence, or repeated implementation friction show that the current structure is increasing future cost or risk. The constraint is strict: externally observable behavior must stay stable. If behavior changes, the work is feature development or defect fixing, not refactoring.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Focused target: identify a single structural problem such as duplication, oversized functions, unstable seams, hidden dependencies, or misleading naming, and define the invariant that must remain.
- Safety-first workflow: strengthen the behavioral safety net by ensuring tests validate critical behavior; add characterization tests if needed to prevent regressions.
- Reversible steps: perform refactors as small, verifiable steps (rename for clarity, extract/move responsibilities, reduce duplication) with tests after each step.
- Validation and documentation: prove design improvements (lower coupling, simpler control flow, clearer boundaries) and document gains for future maintenance.
Quick Start
Identify a single structural problem, implement reversible, test-backed changes, and verify behavior remains stable with the existing test suite.