refine

You refine project requirements through structured Socratic dialogue that elicits missing details and confirms assumptions, closing gaps between initial plans and stakeholder expectations. This iterative clarification produces precise, testable requirements.

The best way to incorporate think feedback into plan refinement is by integrating it with your existing plan.json to identify and fix risks or gaps. This structured approach ensures trade-offs are analyzed and decisions are locked with clear rationale.

You elicit missing details and confirm assumptions during the planning phase by engaging in guided Socratic dialogue. This method prompts targeted clarifying questions to move ambiguous initial plans toward executable roadmaps.

Yes, you can use structured dialogue to perform trade-off analysis that compares alternatives and locks decisions with rationale. This ensures that chosen paths are justified and traceable across product, project, or research work.

You save refined requirements to analysis/refined-requirements.md and update the plan accordingly to ensure traceable changes. This enforces a clear record of iterative clarification and feedback integration.

Yes, iterative plan refinement works for product management, project planning, and research work. The dialogue-driven approach applies broadly to requirement elicitation and risk mitigation across these domains to produce executable roadmaps.