What problem does it solve? Keeping a generated landing page consistent is hard: the HTML is built from a Python template, prose is shared with a README, and catalog descriptions live in JSON registries. This Skill guides reviews and edits of the Studies index so every change is made at the correct source of truth and verified with the right rebuild and test commands. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Structured editorial review: Walks the page section by section (hero, navigation, Start here path, catalog, contribution flow) with concrete editorial checks on voice, status labels, and comparison framing. - Source-of-truth editing: Directs changes to Scripts/_build_studies_index.py, Studies/README.md, and proposal-registry.json instead of hand-editing generated HTML or catalog JSON. - Rebuild and verification workflow: Provides the exact commands to rebuild the index, finalize artifacts, verify output, and run glossary, reader, and CI-related tests. - Use Case: When updating a study's catalog description or refreshing the landing page copy, follow this Skill to edit the right files, regenerate artifacts, and confirm README, catalog JSON, and generated HTML stay synchronized. ## Quick Start Review the Studies landing page and report prioritized improvements without editing any files.