reflect

Analyze recent conversation history to identify repeated corrections, misunderstandings, and missing context in your CLAUDE.md memory files. The reflection workflow detects these patterns across three phases—initial analysis, interaction, and implementation—then proposes concrete, targeted edits with justification to strengthen memory consistency.

Reflection identifies repeated corrections you've made, gaps in context that caused misunderstandings, inconsistencies between related instructions, and misfiled information within CLAUDE.md. It surfaces these issues with precise locations and proposes specific edits to prevent recurrence.

The reflection workflow presents proposed changes for your approval before any edits occur. Changes are minimal and targeted, respecting existing structure and supported memory locations. You review each change, its justification, and constraints before implementation.

Yes. Reflection maintains your existing CLAUDE.md structure while proposing edits to specific sections. It respects import behavior and anti-pattern guidance, ensuring changes integrate cohesively without restructuring your memory layout.

Changes are testable when they address measurable problems—repeated misunderstandings, conflicting instructions, or missing context. Each proposed edit includes targets, justification, and expected outcomes, allowing you to verify whether the change prevents the original issue.