reflect

Post-implementation self-review automates an audit of recent changes for correctness, conventions, architecture, tests, and completeness to catch issues before peer review. It launches a reflector agent to run checks and report issues, clean areas, and questions.

Auditing recent code branches for project conventions is handled by an automated reflector agent that runs canonical checks on your commits. It surfaces gaps in code quality and adherence to project standards before formal review.

You can run a quick, single-pass reflection on your latest commits to surface issues independently. This automated assessment checks correctness, architecture, tests, and conventions without triggering a full formal review.

Self-reviewing code changes before /review reduces downstream defects and rework. The reflection process identifies gaps in completeness and quality early, ensuring issues are caught and resolved independently before peer review.

An automated self-review checks recently implemented features for correctness, conventions, architecture, testing, and completeness. It evaluates these dimensions to report clean areas, surface issues, and ask clarifying questions.

You need to run an automated reflection on your code changes after a feature is implemented but before submitting for peer review. This timing allows you to surface and fix issues independently, reducing downstream rework.