reflection

Evaluate PRD section drafts against four rubrics and output verdict, score, and triage decisions.

Updated Apr 16, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/wlee075/chatbot --skill reflection-wlee075
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: reflection
Source: https://github.com/wlee075/chatbot/tree/main/skills/reflection
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/wlee075/chatbot --skill reflection-wlee075

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Reflection provides a structured, automated gate to quality by evaluating drafts against four rubrics and producing a formal verdict, triage, and recovery signals to guide section advancement.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Four-rubric scoring (completeness, specificity, internal consistency, implementability) with parsed outputs including overall score, verdict, and triage decisions.
  • Triage and recovery counters to govern routing of sections through the workflow.
  • Output of requirement gaps and a detailed reflective summary for reviewers to act on.

Quick Start

Invoke the reflector on the current draft and PRD sections to generate a structured evaluation.

Frequently Asked Questions about reflection

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I evaluate a draft section against quality rubrics for completeness and specificity?

Draft quality assessment uses a four-rubric scoring system for completeness, specificity, consistency, and implementability to generate an overall score, formal verdict, and triage decision.

How does triage routing work for PRD sections that fail quality checks?

Triage routing for PRD sections uses recovery counters generated from the quality assessment to govern workflow progression, determining whether a draft advances or requires revision based on identified requirement gaps.

What is the best way to automate quality gates for draft narratives?

Automating quality gates for draft narratives requires invoking a reflector on the current draft to parse outputs including overall score, verdict, triage decisions, and a detailed reflective summary for reviewers.

Do I need specific system prompts to generate a structured verdict for draft narratives?

Generating a structured verdict requires REFLECTOR_SYSTEM prompts and reflect_node integration to parse the draft and output the formal quality assessment, overall score, and identified requirement gaps.

Can I use this rubric scoring approach for both PRD sections and general draft narratives?

Rubric scoring applies to both PRD sections and draft narratives, evaluating them against the four rubrics to produce a structured quality assessment, triage decisions, and recovery signals for section advancement.

What are the limitations of automated quality assessment for draft progression?

Automated quality assessment limitations include dependency on REFLECTOR_SYSTEM prompts and reflect_node integration to parse outputs, meaning without these environment prerequisites, verdict and triage generation will not function.