reflexion:critique

To run a multi-agent code review, this Skill coordinates three specialized judge agents to independently assess requirements alignment, solution architecture, and code quality, then resolves differences through cross-judge debate to produce a final consensus report.

Multi-agent critique is an evaluation method where independent judge agents review software deliverables in parallel, debate their findings, and synthesize a structured consensus report with explicit scoring and actionable recommendations.

Yes, you can apply this multi-agent review workflow to design proposals and code changes as well as completed software deliverables, preserving a read-only workflow that generates evaluations without applying automatic fixes.

No, the multi-agent consensus review does not automatically fix documented gaps; it operates a read-only, review-only workflow that outputs explicit scoring, identified gaps, and actionable next steps for your team to address.

The best way to get a structured evaluation report is to instruct the system to critique your latest work, which triggers context gathering, parallel judging, cross-review debates, and consensus reporting with documented strengths and gaps.

No, you do not need to install any dependencies or components to use the multi-agent critiquing workflow, as it operates natively to coordinate the specialized judges and generate the consensus evaluation report.