refresh

Re-run production readiness assessments and compare results to a previous analysis.

14|Updated Jan 29, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Hypership-Software/vibe-check --skill refresh-hypership-software
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: refresh
Source: https://github.com/Hypership-Software/vibe-check/tree/main/skills/refresh
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Hypership-Software/vibe-check --skill refresh-hypership-software

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Vibe Check Refresh solves the problem of validating whether fixes actually resolved previously identified production-readiness issues by performing a full, fresh assessment and comparing results to the prior run so teams can see real progress and regressions.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Full Re-analysis: Clears stale analysis, remaps the codebase, runs audits (npm/yarn/pnpm) and domain assessors for a comprehensive fresh view.
  • Compare & Reconcile: Matches new checklist items against the previous assessment, removes false positives, tracks improvements, and detects regressions.
  • Report & Update Outputs: Renumbers checklist items, updates metadata.json with previousAnalysis, and rewrites summary, report, and action-plan files.
  • Use Case: After applying fixes or dependency updates, run this to confirm which issues are resolved, which remain, and what new problems appeared.

Quick Start

Run the refresh skill to perform a full reassessment and receive a before/after progress report.

Frequently Asked Questions about refresh

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I re-run a production readiness assessment after fixing codebase issues?

Delta tracking in production readiness assessments works by comparing new checklist items against a previous analysis to identify improvements and regressions. It matches updated results to prior findings, clearing stale data and confirming which codebase fixes actually resolved previously identified issues.

What's the best way to validate that codebase changes resolved previous security and performance findings?

The best way to validate codebase changes is to perform a fresh assessment that reconciles new checklist items against previous analysis metadata. This approach removes false positives, detects regressions, and updates summary and report files to reflect real progress across all audited domains.

Does the refresh process require clearing previous analysis metadata before re-running audits?

Yes, the refresh process clears stale analysis data before remapping the codebase and running npm, yarn, or pnpm audits. This ensures the reconciliation step accurately compares only current findings against the stored previous analysis metadata without interference from outdated results.

Can I track production readiness regressions across multiple domains after a dependency update?

Production readiness reassessment limitations include the need for a complete codebase remapping and full audit re-execution rather than incremental checks. If previous analysis metadata is missing or corrupted, delta tracking cannot compare results or remove false positives effectively.