reg-gap-analysis

Diff AI regulations against current governance posture and produce dated markdown remediation plans.

Updated Dec 4, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/PolliticalSolutions/political-portal --skill reg-gap-analysis-polliticalsolutions
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: reg-gap-analysis
Source: https://github.com/PolliticalSolutions/political-portal/tree/main/.claude/skills/ai-governance-legal/reg-gap-analysis
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/PolliticalSolutions/political-portal --skill reg-gap-analysis-polliticalsolutions

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

It helps you determine what new or updated AI regulation requires you to change by comparing the regulation’s obligations against your current AI governance posture, then turning that comparison into a prioritized remediation plan.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Regulation scoping and applicability: Determines whether the regulation applies to your organization by checking jurisdiction, thresholds, and whether you act as a builder, deployer, or both.
  • Requirement extraction with citations: Breaks the regulation into actionable requirements (e.g., transparency, impact assessment, human oversight, governance, vendor flow-down) with source attribution and verification guidance.
  • Gap diff plus remediation tracker: Diffs extracted requirements against your existing governance documents to produce must-do/should-do/already-compliant/accepted gaps, including owners and due dates.

Quick Start

Run reg-gap-analysis with a regulation name or pasted regulatory text, and it will produce a dated markdown remediation plan based on your current posture from the configured CLAUDE governance file.

Frequently Asked Questions about reg-gap-analysis

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I perform an EU AI Act gap analysis against my current AI governance posture?

Perform an EU AI Act gap analysis by diffing newly issued regulatory requirements against your existing AI governance documents to identify compliance gaps. This process extracts actionable requirements, evaluates jurisdictional applicability, and generates a structured markdown remediation plan with prioritized fixes.

What is regulatory gap assessment for AI regulation and when do I need it?

Regulatory gap assessment for AI regulation is the process of comparing new legal obligations against your current governance posture to find compliance shortfalls. You need it when a regulation is newly issued, updated, or discovered to determine required changes to your AI operations.

How do I extract AI compliance requirements from new regulations with citations?

Extract AI compliance requirements with citations by breaking down regulatory text into actionable obligations like transparency and human oversight. The gap analysis process applies citation tiering to source regulations, verifying requirements while checking jurisdiction and role applicability for builders or deployers.

Can I generate a prioritized AI compliance remediation tracker from pasted regulatory text?

Generate a prioritized AI compliance remediation tracker by inputting a regulation name or pasted regulatory text. The analysis produces a dated markdown output that categorizes gaps into must-do and should-do items, assigning specific remediation owners and deadlines for each requirement.

Does AI regulation gap analysis check if my organization is a builder or deployer?

AI regulation gap analysis checks your organization's role applicability by evaluating jurisdiction, thresholds, and whether you act as a builder, deployer, or both. This scoping mechanism determines if the regulation legally applies to your operations before extracting compliance requirements.

What's the best way to prioritize AI governance gaps for remediation planning?

Prioritize AI governance gaps for remediation planning by diffing extracted regulatory requirements against existing governance documents to categorize them as must-do, should-do, already-compliant, or accepted gaps. This structured approach yields a dated markdown tracker with assigned owners and due dates.