What problem does it solve? When a new AI regulation or guidance drops, legal teams must quickly determine whether it applies, what it requires, and what gaps exist in their current governance posture. This Skill automates that diff, turning regulatory text into a prioritized remediation plan with owners and deadlines. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Scope Determination: Researches jurisdiction, thresholds, and builder/deployer distinctions to confirm whether a regulation actually applies before analyzing it. - Requirements Extraction & Gap Diff: Extracts every substantive obligation (transparency, impact assessment, human oversight, prohibited practices) and compares each against your use case registry, AI policy commitments, and vendor positions. - Prioritized Remediation Plan: Outputs must-do, should-do, already-compliant, and accepted-gap tables with owners, deadlines, and effort estimates, saved as a dated markdown tracker. - Use Case: The EU AI Act's high-risk provisions take effect. Run the analysis to get a gap list showing which obligations your current impact assessment practice already covers and which require new human oversight steps, with a remediation tracker for the legal team. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to run a gap analysis for the EU AI Act high-risk provisions against our current AI governance posture.
