reg-gap-analysis

Name: reg-gap-analysis
Availability: InStock
Author: Yachela

Diff new AI regulations against current governance and output a dated remediation plan.

Updated May 26, 2026

Search Tags:#gap analysis #regulatory compliance #ai governance #risk remediation #legal citations #effective dates

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/yachela/claude-for-legal-ar --skill reg-gap-analysis-yachela

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: reg-gap-analysis
Source: https://github.com/yachela/claude-for-legal-ar/tree/main/ai-governance-legal/skills/reg-gap-analysis
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/yachela/claude-for-legal-ar --skill reg-gap-analysis-yachela

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps you compare a newly issued AI regulation or guidance against your organization’s existing AI governance so you can identify concrete compliance gaps before enforcement matters.

Core Features & Use Cases

Regulation-to-governance diff: Breaks the incoming regulation into actionable requirements and maps each one against your current posture.
Prioritized remediation tracker: Produces must-do, should-do, already-compliant, and accepted-gap sections with owners and deadlines.
Scope and effective-date discipline: Scopes applicability (jurisdiction, thresholds, builder vs. deployer role, sector carve-outs) and highlights phase-in timing and ambiguity for attorney judgment.
Evidence-focused output: Encourages primary-source research with citation attribution tiers and a final “verification pass” reminder.

Quick Start

Run a gap analysis by issuing the command: /reg-gap-analysis "EU AI Act high-risk provisions".

Frequently Asked Questions about reg-gap-analysis

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I identify compliance gaps when a new AI regulation is issued?▼

To identify compliance gaps, perform a regulatory gap analysis by diffing the new AI regulation against your organization’s current governance posture. This extracts actionable requirements with citations to map what you must fix before enforcement matters.

What is the best way to prioritize risk remediation for AI governance?▼

The best way to prioritize risk remediation is to classify gaps by enforcement impact. This produces a remediation plan separating must-do, should-do, already-compliant, and accepted-gap sections with designated owners and deadlines.

How do I check if a new AI guidance rule applies to my organization's deployer role?▼

To check if AI guidance applies to your deployer role, conduct scope determination during your gap analysis. This evaluates jurisdiction, thresholds, builder versus deployer roles, and sector carve-outs before extracting compliance requirements.

Can I perform a regulatory gap analysis directly from raw regulatory text?▼

Yes, you can perform a gap analysis directly from regulatory text. The process applies to compliance checks when regulatory text is provided for review, extracting requirements with citation attribution tiers and highlighting phase-in timing ambiguity.

How do I track phase-in timing and effective dates for AI regulatory compliance?▼

Track phase-in timing and effective dates by applying scope and effective-date discipline during your gap analysis. This highlights phase-in timing and ambiguity for attorney judgment, saving the final remediation plan as a dated markdown output.