regulatory-knowledge

Document regulatory differences and compliance constraints for A-share, Hong Kong, U.S., and crypto trading.

30.4k|4.9k|Updated Apr 1, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/HKUDS/Vibe-Trading --skill regulatory-knowledge
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: regulatory-knowledge
Source: https://github.com/HKUDS/Vibe-Trading/tree/main/agent/src/skills/regulatory-knowledge
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/HKUDS/Vibe-Trading --skill regulatory-knowledge

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Prevents strategy builders from relying on inaccurate assumptions about trading limits, settlement, fees, and tax implications that would distort backtests or cause real-world compliance breaches when deploying across A-shares, Hong Kong, U.S., and crypto venues.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Regulatory rule breakdowns: Detailed summaries of A-share limit-up/limit-down, T+1 constraints, financing/shorting costs, Hong Kong T+0/uptick-style short rules, U.S. PDT/LULD/Reg SHO, and evolving crypto oversight.
  • Analysis framework: Includes a reusable rule constraint matrix, cross-market compliance checklist, and cost/tax impact tables to calibrate quant models and risk controls.
  • Use case: Quant teams designing A+HK pair trades can use the guidance to model liquidity windows, settlement mismatches, and borrowing fees before running any automated execution.

Quick Start

Ask the skill to summarize the regulatory constraints and cost impacts for pairing 600519.SH with 0700.HK in a multi-market strategy.

Frequently Asked Questions about regulatory-knowledge

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
What are the regulatory differences for cross-market trading between A-share and Hong Kong stock?

Cross-market trading regulatory differences between A-share and Hong Kong stock include constraints like A-share T+1 settlement and limit-up/limit-down rules versus Hong Kong T+0 and uptick-style short rules. The skill provides detailed rule matrices and cost estimates to calibrate quant models for these specific market mismatches.

How do I adjust backtesting parameters for A-share T+1 constraints and U.S. PDT rules?

To adjust backtesting parameters for A-share T+1 constraints and U.S. PDT rules, apply the skill's reusable rule constraint matrix and cost impact tables. This calibrates your quant strategy by modeling settlement mismatches, liquidity windows, and financing costs before automated execution.

Does this skill provide compliance guidance for cryptocurrency trading environments?

Yes, this skill provides compliance guidance for cryptocurrency trading environments. It documents evolving crypto oversight alongside A-share, Hong Kong, and U.S. regulations, offering detailed summaries to ensure your cross-market quant strategies remain compliant across digital asset venues.

Can I use this skill to model liquidity windows and borrowing fees for pair trades?

Yes, you can use this skill to model liquidity windows and borrowing fees for pair trades. It includes a cross-market compliance checklist and cost/tax impact tables designed specifically to help quant teams calibrate risk controls for multi-market pair trading scenarios.

What is the best way to document compliance constraints for multi-market quant strategies?

The best way to document compliance constraints for multi-market quant strategies is using a reusable rule constraint matrix. This skill provides detailed summaries of market-specific limits like U.S. LULD and Reg SHO, alongside cost estimates to prevent real-world compliance breaches.

Why do backtests fail when deploying across A-share and U.S. markets?

Backtests fail when deploying across A-share and U.S. markets due to inaccurate assumptions about trading limits, settlement, and tax implications. This skill prevents distortion by providing detailed regulatory rule breakdowns for A-share T+1 and U.S. PDT constraints to calibrate your models.