rejection-feedback

What problem does it solve?

Recruiters face significant legal and candidate experience risk when drafting post-interview rejection feedback, as ad-hoc wording can violate EEOC guidelines, jurisdiction-specific employment laws, or include unsubstantiated claims that expose the company to discrimination or defamation claims.

Core Features & Use Cases

• Compliant, Evidence-Grounded Drafting: Generates personalized rejection emails and recruiter call talking points using only verified interviewer scorecard data and approved rubric phrasing, eliminating unvetted, risky language.
• Multi-Layer Safety Guardrails: Automatically blocks banned phrases, false specifics, and comparative ranking language, halts drafting for jurisdiction-flagged or legally sensitive cases, and requires recruiter review before any content is sent.
• Use Case: For a recruiter who just completed an onsite interview loop for a Senior Backend Engineer role and the candidate explicitly requested feedback, this skill pulls signed scorecards, cross-references interview transcripts if available, and produces a vetted draft saved to your local drafts folder for review.

Quick Start

Provide the candidate's ATS ID, role ID, residency jurisdiction, and whether feedback was requested to generate a vetted rejection feedback draft saved to your drafts folder for review.