relevance-evals

Manage agent evaluations in Relevance AI with test cases and eval runs.

1|Updated Mar 12, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/RelevanceAI/agent-skills --skill relevance-evals
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: relevance-evals
Source: https://github.com/RelevanceAI/agent-skills/tree/main/reference/relevance-evals
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/RelevanceAI/agent-skills --skill relevance-evals

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Manages the end-to-end evaluation process for AI agents, enabling structured test design, execution, and results analysis within Relevance AI.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Test-set and test-case management for end-to-end agent evals
  • Two evaluation modes: generate_and_score and score_only
  • Batch-based result tracking with per-run rule judgments and summaries
  • Guidelines for designing reliable, observable rules and scenarios

Quick Start

Create a new test set, add test cases, run an evaluation batch, and review the results.

Frequently Asked Questions about relevance-evals

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate agent evaluations and testing?

To automate agent evaluations, you can create test sets, add test cases, run evaluation batches, and review results. This workflow supports generating conversations and scoring them using an LLM judge.

What is the difference between generate_and_score and score_only evaluation modes?

The generate_and_score mode runs conversations and evaluates them, while score_only evaluates existing outputs. Both modes provide batch-based result tracking with per-run rule judgments and summaries for agent testing.

How do I create and manage test cases for AI agent evaluations?

You can manage test cases by creating a new test set and adding specific scenarios. The system provides guidelines for designing reliable, observable rules to ensure accurate end-to-end agent evaluations.

Can I review batch-level summaries and per-run results for agent test cases?

Yes, you can review batch-level summaries and per-run rule judgments. The evaluation workflow allows you to inspect individual results after triggering batches to analyze agent performance thoroughly.

What's the best way to design reliable rules for agent conversation testing?

The best way to design reliable rules is to follow structured guidelines for creating observable scenarios. This ensures your test cases accurately measure agent performance during generate_and_score or score_only eval runs.