remediate-failures

Correct QA review failures and rule violations until quality gates pass.

1|Updated Mar 12, 2026

Search Tags:#quality assurance #code review #qa #bug fixing #remediation #acceptance criteria

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/bketelsen/truenas-mcp --skill remediate-failures

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: remediate-failures
Source: https://github.com/bketelsen/truenas-mcp/tree/main/.gaai/core/skills/delivery/remediate-failures
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/bketelsen/truenas-mcp --skill remediate-failures

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill addresses issues identified during Quality Assurance (QA) reviews, ensuring that code meets acceptance criteria, adheres to defined rules, and resolves any detected regressions or deviations.

Core Features & Use Cases

Automated Failure Correction: Identifies and fixes specific failures reported by QA.
Rule Adherence: Ensures compliance with established coding standards and project rules.
Scope Preservation: Applies fixes without altering the original project scope or intent.
Use Case: After a QA review flags a story as 'FAIL' due to unmet acceptance criteria, this Skill can be activated to analyze the report, implement the necessary corrections, and prepare the story for re-validation.

Quick Start

Activate the remediate-failures skill with the failing qa_report and relevant contexts to fix identified issues.

Frequently Asked Questions about remediate-failures

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I fix code review failures and unmet acceptance criteria after a QA review?▼

Fix QA failures by mapping detected violations to acceptance criteria, determining minimal corrective changes, applying fixes, and looping re-validation against story rules until all quality gates pass.

What is the best way to automate bug fixing when a QA review returns a FAIL status?▼

Automated bug fixing analyzes the failing QA report to identify rule violations and acceptance criteria gaps, then applies targeted corrections without redefining the original project scope or intent.

How do I correct QA failures without altering the original project scope?▼

Correct QA failures by applying minimal corrective changes strictly targeted at the detected rule violations and acceptance criteria gaps, ensuring the original story scope and intent remain completely preserved.

Can I use automated remediation to meet coding standards and quality gates?▼

Yes, automated remediation ensures compliance with established coding standards by correcting deviations and regressions, looping through fixes and re-validation until all defined quality gates successfully pass.

What happens if my code still fails quality gates after applying initial fixes?▼

If quality gates still fail, the remediation process loops by re-evaluating the QA report, mapping remaining failures to story criteria, and applying further corrective changes until full validation passes.

Does this remediation approach work with existing quality assurance workflows?▼

Yes, it integrates with quality assurance workflows by activating when qa-review returns FAIL, using the provided qa_report and relevant contexts to analyze and implement the necessary corrections for re-validation.