remediate-failures

Map QA failures to acceptance criteria and apply minimal fixes until validation passes.

Updated Mar 8, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/petrSimonidesXart/xPmGateway --skill remediate-failures-petrsimonidesxart
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: remediate-failures
Source: https://github.com/petrSimonidesXart/xPmGateway/tree/main/.gaai/core/skills/delivery/remediate-failures
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/petrSimonidesXart/xPmGateway --skill remediate-failures-petrsimonidesxart

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

QA reviews frequently uncover failures, rule violations, and gaps in acceptance criteria that block delivery. This skill identifies every defect from QA, links it to the relevant criteria or rules, and plans concise, scoped remediation.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Map QA failures to acceptance criteria, rules violated, and implementation gaps.
  • Apply minimal, verifiable fixes and re-validate against the criteria.
  • Loop remediation until all quality gates pass; escalate after three unsuccessful cycles.

Quick Start

Initiate automated remediation cycles to fix QA failures and re-run validation until all criteria are met.

Frequently Asked Questions about remediate-failures

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate QA remediation for failing acceptance criteria?

To automate QA remediation, this skill identifies failures from the QA report, maps them to violated acceptance criteria, and applies minimal targeted fixes. It loops through remediation and validation cycles until all quality gates pass.

What is the best way to fix QA failures without widening the project scope?

The best way to fix QA failures without scope creep is applying minimal, targeted fixes. This skill maps identified defects to specific rules violated and applies scoped corrections, ensuring remediation stays focused and verifiable.

How does automated defect tracking handle repeated validation failures?

Automated defect tracking handles repeated failures by looping remediation cycles. If convergence is not achieved after three unsuccessful validation attempts, the skill escalates the issue to Discovery for further investigation.

Can I use automated workflows to map QA failures to implementation gaps?

Yes, you can use automated workflows to map QA failures. This skill precisely links each defect from the QA report to the relevant acceptance criteria, rules violated, or specific implementation gaps before planning remediation.

When should I escalate QA failures instead of continuing automated remediation loops?

You should escalate QA failures when convergence is not achieved after three remediation attempts. The skill automatically escalates persistent failures to Discovery to prevent endless looping on unresolvable validation errors.