remember

You can save debugging insights and architectural decisions across sessions by explicitly capturing them into a MEMORY.md log with timestamps and contextual notes. This ensures hard-won knowledge is reliably recalled instead of lost.

Logging project conventions is best handled by writing explicit memory entries with timestamps and context into a MEMORY.md file. The system parses input, checks for duplicates, and appends concise lines to keep the log clean.

Knowledge capture handles duplicate entries by checking the existing MEMORY.md log before appending new lines. This deterministic workflow parses the input, detects duplicates, and prevents redundant memory entries from accumulating.

You need to promote enduring knowledge to project standards when a memory entry represents a rule or standard. Captured knowledge can be elevated to CLAUDE.md to enforce project conventions, moving it from a memory log to an active rule.

Yes, explicit memory entries are designed to capture hard-won debugging insights across coding projects. They are saved with timestamps and contextual notes to ensure critical knowledge is reliably recalled regardless of the active session.

Saving context with timestamps matters because it ensures critical insights are captured with their original surrounding details. This explicit memory management approach prevents knowledge loss and provides a reliable chronological log for future recall.