repo-review-docs

Documentation truth drift is detected by comparing README, demos, release notes, and CLI docs against actual code and artifacts to flag behavioral discrepancies. This process yields a structured findings artifact detailing severity and ownership.

Onboarding gap analysis surfaces missing prerequisites or unclear setup steps in repository documentation that hinder reproducibility. It reviews bounded repository slices to identify where demos and release notes fail to reflect actual code behavior.

Review release notes and demos for misleading claims by constraining the review to bounded repository slices and checking claimed behavior against code, tests, and artifacts. The output includes a reviewed-doc surface list and a residual risk assessment.

You can assess residual risk for documentation anomalies by applying a bounded review to constrained repository slices where docs claim behavior not reflected in code. The process outputs a residual risk assessment following a shared output contract.

Tracking documentation governance in multi-agent workflows requires a bounded, role-based lens to verify repository documentation remains truthful and actionable. It provides structured findings for synthesis to track milestone and release documentation drift.