report-executive

Synthesize validated security findings into executive risk reports with regulatory mapping.

Updated Jul 30, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/salmanabdurrahman/pi-pentest-agent --skill report-executive
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: report-executive
Source: https://github.com/salmanabdurrahman/pi-pentest-agent/tree/main/skills/report-executive
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/salmanabdurrahman/pi-pentest-agent --skill report-executive

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill bridges the gap between technical security findings and business-level decision-making by translating complex vulnerabilities into clear, actionable risk summaries for leadership.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Risk Normalization: Automatically maps technical severity levels to business-impact categories like financial, operational, and reputational risk.
  • Regulatory Mapping: Connects findings to specific compliance frameworks such as GDPR, PCI DSS, and HIPAA to highlight potential audit and legal exposure.
  • Strategic Reporting: Generates a structured executive brief including a risk heat map, remediation roadmap, and resource requirements without exposing raw proof or sensitive secrets.

Quick Start

Use the report-executive skill to generate a management risk summary based on the current list of confirmed findings.

Frequently Asked Questions about report-executive

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I generate an executive risk report from pentest findings?

To generate an executive risk report from pentest findings, this skill transforms validated security vulnerabilities into non-technical summaries by mapping technical severity to business impact categories like financial and operational risk. It requires integration with existing finding stores to produce accurate leadership briefs.

What is the best way to map technical vulnerabilities to compliance frameworks like GDPR and HIPAA?

Mapping technical vulnerabilities to compliance frameworks like GDPR and HIPAA is achieved through regulatory mapping, which connects findings to specific legal requirements to highlight potential audit exposure. This process translates technical security flaws into clear compliance risks for stakeholders.

Can I include raw proof-of-concept evidence in my executive security summaries?

You cannot include raw proof-of-concept evidence in executive security summaries because the skill enforces strict redaction of sensitive evidence and secrets. It generates structured briefs featuring risk heat maps and remediation roadmaps without exposing raw proof to protect sensitive data.

Does this skill require integrating with a specific finding store before generating management risk summaries?

Generating management risk summaries does require integration with existing finding stores and policy validation gates. This prerequisite ensures the executive brief accurately reflects confirmed vulnerabilities and safely normalizes the data into strategic reporting for leadership consumption.

Why does my pentest report need policy validation gates before translating it into business risk?

Policy validation gates are needed before translating pentest reports into business risk to ensure accurate and safe reporting. They validate confirmed findings against established policies, preventing unverified vulnerabilities from being mapped to financial, operational, or reputational risk categories.

What is risk normalization and how does it apply to security reporting?

Risk normalization in security reporting is the automatic mapping of technical severity levels to business-impact categories such as financial, operational, and reputational risk. It bridges the gap between technical findings and business-level decision-making for leadership stakeholders.