report-meta-critic

What problem does it solve?

Independent meta-review (L4) of finished reports to identify blind spots, detect biases, and provide actionable directions that L3 reviewers miss.

Core Features & Use Cases

• Blindspots — what's missing Questions the report should answer but didn't:
  • "未讨论 A 在边缘场景的稳定性"
  • "comparison includes B vs C but ignores D which is a stronger competitor"
  • "claims market leadership but no segmentation analysis (geo / vertical)"
• Bias flags — implicit positioning Hidden stance, leading framing, asymmetric evidence.
  • "结论先行，'标准范式'被使用 5 次但证据不足"
  • "every counterexample is dismissed in one sentence; supporting evidence gets full paragraphs"
• Suggestions — actionable improvement Concrete directions if the report were to be redone. Each suggestion starts with a verb.
  • "增设 §6 限制章节，用 matched-compute 数据对比 A/B"
  • "Replace §3's case study with two — current case study is the same vendor as primary source"

Quick Start

Provide an L4 independent review for a finished report and return a structured critique detailing blindspots, bias flags, and concrete improvements.