repository-structure

To generate a repository structure document from product requirements and architecture notes, use a tool that reads inputs like docs/product-requirements.md, docs/functional-design.md, and docs/architecture.md to output a standardized docs/repository-structure.md defining directory layouts and naming conventions.

Standardizing folder layouts and test placement across projects requires a repository structure document that enforces rules for directory responsibilities, naming conventions, and test placement, ensuring consistent file layouts generated from functional design and architecture inputs.

Translating a PRD and functional design into a directory structure involves extracting architectural inputs to outline file layouts, module responsibilities, and docs placement, then generating a repository-structure.md that enforces rules for directories, tests, and naming.

Yes, defining repository structure and scaling guidelines requires existing architecture documentation, specifically docs/product-requirements.md, docs/functional-design.md, and docs/architecture.md, to extract the necessary architectural and design inputs for your repository layout.

A repository structure document for a new software project should include directory responsibilities, naming conventions, dependencies, test placement, and scaling guidelines, all derived from the project's PRD, functional design, and architecture notes.

Your repository structure lacks consistent module responsibilities and naming conventions because it was not generated from a standardized repository-structure document that enforces rules for directories, tests, and naming based on architectural and design inputs.