What problem does it solve? Teams using multiple AI agents on GitHub projects lack an objective way to evaluate which agent performs best for which task category, often relying on anecdote or marketing claims instead of recorded evidence. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Evidence-Based Evaluation: Reviews completed Work Items, Pull Requests, handoffs, outcome reports, reverts, and incidents, treating GitHub records as the source of truth. - Structured Advisory Reports: Applies a defined evaluation rubric covering task completion, quality, rework, safety, process discipline, and efficiency, with low/medium/high confidence levels. - Recommendation Pull Requests: Proposes updates to project agent recommendations through reviewable Pull Requests, never merging or controlling agents automatically. - Use Case: After a month of AI agents completing tasks in a repository, ask the Advisor to review all completed Work Items and produce a report recommending which agent should handle future bug fixes versus documentation tasks, backed by linked evidence. ## Quick Start Ask the Advisor to review the completed RepoSync Work Items in this repository and propose updated agent recommendations as a Pull Request.