request-refactor-plan

To break a large codebase refactor into safe incremental commits, you generate a commit-by-commit plan aligned with Martin Fowler's guidance, ensuring each step preserves functionality. This structures refactoring into low-risk, tiny changes across the target code area.

An interview-informed refactoring plan is a structured strategy that gathers problem context, desired outcomes, constraints, and implementation assumptions before planning the work. It validates repository state and proposes alternatives to reduce risk before decomposing the refactor.

Creating a refactoring RFC as a GitHub issue involves documenting a structured refactor plan with dedicated sections for decisions, testing strategy, and explicit out-of-scope items. The issue-ready deliverable captures the incremental change sequence for implementation and review.

Defining scope and out-of-scope items for a module refactor requires an interview-driven approach to gather explicit context and constraints. The resulting plan documents out-of-scope items in structured GitHub issue sections to maintain strict boundaries during implementation.

Yes, verifying repository state before proposing a refactor plan is a core requirement. The planning process checks the repository to validate claims, considers alternative approaches to reduce risk, and sequences tiny commits that preserve functionality throughout the refactoring effort.

The best way to plan an incremental architecture change without breaking functionality is to use a tiny-commit execution plan. It sequences refactoring steps so the codebase keeps working after each change, applying Martin Fowler's guidance to maintain continuous functionality.